So this is something that I picked up at an auction a while
back. I know my last post but one was about auctions so I’m probably sounding
like some auction crazed lunatic right now. But before talking about this
whisky I thought I’d mention that a aspect of auctions that I like and that is
the opportunity to pick up miniatures.
Scotch Whisky Auctions (and others probably) seem to
regularly bundle together miniatures to sell off and they seem to go for pretty
reasonable prices. For example, I got 10
assorted minis for £25 and it included some cool stuff - an old Bunnhabhain
(possibly one of their first miniatures produced after checking on Twitter) and
a lovely old Signatory Strathmill that’s got me interested in that distillery. It was a random selection with some stuff
better than others. But whilst certain minis are highly sought after (mainly silent stills) they generally don’t seem to be that collectable. So they’re
great for picking up for that other reason to buy whisky – i.e. to drink.
Ralfy, as ever, does a great bit about miniatures. One thing he
mentions in there is you can pick up minis of different ages of the same
bottling (e.g. an Ardbeg 10 from 90s or 2000s) and compare them with their latest
incarnation to see how consistent it is.
 |
| Photo not stolen from Master of Malt for once |
A note of caution though is that neck fill levels are
often lower than full-size bottles so I assume they’re more susceptible to air getting in. As ever
always study the pictures carefully.
So, anyway, Scotia
Royale is not something I’d ever come across and I thought it might be just a
weird wee blend that you often see (a lot of these on auction sites – and obscure
doesn’t necessarily mean valuable or quality either). Certainly it was obscure enough that
I struggled to find a stock photo online anywhere.
A bit of label reading and googling told me that it was
bottled by A Gillies and produced by Glen Scotia. Reading up a bit more on this
it seems that this company is dormant and the distillery shut in 1982 and lay
silent until 2000. Another good thing about picking up random bottles is the chance to
do some amateur sleuthing.
So this wee bottle is probably quite old depending on when they actually bottled it. It still had a decent neck fill. If it was produced at Glen Scotia I’m not sure how much is grain and whether the malt is Glen Scotia. Certainly the label doesn’t give too much away – even the alcohol % is a mystery.
On to the tasting. First things first; it had that certain
mustiness to it that some old bottles have, that it needed to shake off – a kind of carboard/cupboard feeling. But
I found it dissipated as a bit more air got to it.
Colour wise it was quite golden syrupy. Smooth on the nose with some gentle sweetness, not too
much of that candy sweetness you get with grain. More like sultanas in an old
jar.
It reminded me of Chivas 12 with its lighter style. There’s
a bit of butter and vanilla in there like Chivas. But there’s a bit more to
chew on, more of a battered leather feel to it.
It opened up nicely – really smooth and creamy with a nice
mouthfeel.
There’s was a nice long aftertaste too. Not hugely complex
but tasty. It had that dry Campbeltown style you might get with Springbank. Not
peaty like Glen Scotia is now but perhaps its origins might explain the earthy
quality that made it a bit different to the Chivas.
It looks like it’s seldom seen these days so maybe I’ll
never see this stuff again. It’s nice to have that little connection with the
past though. I wouldn’t bust a gut to
get a full bottle of this. But I know that this isn’t just some random awful
blend but a decent quality whisky.
